Hotel Rwanda is a film which tells us the true story of the Rwandan Genocide. When the Belgians colonised Rwanda they spilt up the people into two ‘races’. The Hutu and the Tutsi. The Belgium government put the Tutsi in charge and gave them all the privileges in life. The Hutus became enraged and jealous of the Tutsis but had no power of their own to do anything about it. Until the Belgians left. When the Belgians had no more use for Rwanda and they had drained all of the country’s resources they just packed their bags and left. However they left the Hutus in charge and they took revenge. And the genocide began. This is what Terry George the director focused his film Hotel Rwanda on. I am going to focus on the four cinematographic techniques I feel make the biggest affect on our physiological view point.
The director increases suspension in the second frame by adding special effects for example fog. While they, Paul and Gregoire are driving along the river road because it is ‘clear’ according to Georges the head of the interahamwe. The fog makes it look peaceful and as if the Genocide is not taking place. It is a long/ establishing shot, at a low angle this is important because you can see the surroundings and you can not see any dead bodies or any signs of a genocide which contrasts what is actually happening in Rwanda. The music adds to the tension because it is a calming peaceful song. however, in the mind of the viewer we know it is too good to be true and too cliche. We know this but nothing can prepare us to the horrors that we see.
The director uses focus in Paul’s epiphany scene to show Paul’s mindset and how he has not yet made clear the Genocide in Rwanda. throughout the scene Paul is the only one in focus until he has his epiphany and at that point everything becomes clear in his mind and literally on the road . The frame shows at least fifty dead all laying on the road. This causes Paul to throw up. When he gets back to the hotel he rushes upstairs and has a breakdown and tries to wash away the horrific things he saw on that wretched night.
Terry George also uses non digestic sound to increase tension in Paul’s epiphany scene. As Paul falls out of the van and lands next to a dead child a sound is made. I think it is the sound of two machetes. As we already know machetes were one of the main weapons used by the Interhamwe to commit the murders. Terry George used the machetes to reinforce the fact that these are murders not just deaths, and bloody murders at that. It is also used as a flashback in Paul’s mind. Paul has seen many machetes since the start of the genocide but when he saw the dead bodies he thought of the machetes again.
One of the techniques Terry George uses in his interpretation of the Rwandan genocide is camera shots. I am going to focus on the use of the point of view shot (POV). Through out the scene it goes into the POV of Paul. This is very powerful and plays upon the minds of the viewer because we feel as if we are involved. We do not just watch Paul through this tough time. We become him. Without POV i believe we would just see it as a film and not a true story, however true George’s interpretation of the genocide actually is. The reason it builds tension is because in one of the frames we only see the legs and feet of the dead Rwandans. We begin to build up hope that maybe some people are still alive. Through out this time the came shot is changing and after around five to ten seconds we finally see all the corpses and our hopes are crushed.
In conclusion, what Terry George wanted to achieve was achieved. He wanted us to feel as if we were involved in this terrible time through out history. By increasing tension griped us and wanted us to make chase and stay griped. Rather like a fishing hook with a Big Mac on the end. However I also think he was misleading in his interpretation. The genocide was a lot worse then he made out in his film. This could make the audience not as bothered and in a way say ‘well is wasn’t that bad’. I find this rude because if it was in the western world it would of been top priority and it seems as if it was not that urgent to tell the world the True story of the Rwandan Genocide.

